Faces in Film I: First Blood

SoE: An examination of an interesting aspect of film by Aryan Anthropology.

Many film-watchers are aware of the artistic techniques and aesthetic choices such as camera angles, music, and lighting which are used in film, but less are consciously aware of the deliberate aesthetic choices regarding the appearance (specifically the face shape) of the actors. Perhaps this is because the archetypical differences in face shapes are often intuitively understood, unlike camera angles for instance which are often consciously studied.

Let us examine the face shapes in a classic American movie.

In First Blood, John Rambo (played by Sylvester Stallone) is a Vietnam veteran who drifts into a small town where he is immediately harassed by the town’s sheriff Will Teasle (played by Brian Dennehy). Teasle tells Rambo that a vagrant like him, especially one with a flag on his Army jacket, is not welcome in his town. The sheriff drives Rambo out of town, but Rambo soon turns around and begins to walk back rather than continue walking 30 miles to the next town. Furious at Rambo’s defiance and indifference towards his “authority,” Teasle arrests Rambo.

At the police station, the officers are seen wearing uniforms with American flag patches of the same size that Rambo has on his jacket, revealing the absurd hypocrisy of Teasle’s earlier statement. Rambo refuses to speak and cooperate, but does not act out against the police until the sadistic officer Art Galt (played by Jack Starrett) triggers flash backs of Rambo’s time being tortured as a POW.

Rambo becomes enraged and escapes the police station with little effort, shattering the illusion of power that the police hold. A manhunt ensues and Teasle orders that Rambo is to be captured alive, but Galt is bent on killing Rambo and later falls to his death after recklessly pursuing him. Rambo comes out to surrender after Galt dies, because he wants no further blood to be shed. Teasle, who is angered by the death of Galt, ends up shooting at Rambo (again revealing his hypocrisy since he told Galt he wanted to capture Rambo alive a few seconds ago).

Teasle’s arrogance is further illustrated when the state police, National Guard, and Rambo’s former Army commander, Colonel Trautman (played by Richard Crenna), are brought into the manhunt. Teasle insists on doing things his way, but the viewer is keenly aware by now that Rambo’s skills are superior to Teasle’s. He demands that the National Guardsmen hunting Rambo do not shoot, but the film immediately cuts to a shootout scene between Rambo and the Guardsmen. The shooting stops when Rambo fires back and the Guardsmen are too afraid to return fire–unambiguously showing us who is really in control.

Later, Teasle admits his desire to kill Rambo to Trautman, showing that his earlier commands to take Rambo alive were presumably so Teasle would have the personal “honor” of killing him.

The differences in personality between the characters are mirrored by their differences in physical appearance, most notably their face shapes. Stallone has an Oblong-leaning face while Dennehy, the other police officers, and most of the National Guardesmen have Round or Square-leaning faces. The officers also appear to be at least a generation older than Rambo, although in real life Dennehy is just 8 years older than Stallone!

Stallone and Dennehy

At the police station, Rambo appears calm and reserved, which is juxtaposed with the officers’ chitchat amongst themselves and their hot-tempered orders directed towards Rambo. Rambo’s steely demeanour matches up well with his long, chiselled face and provides an excellent contrast towards the officers’ soft-featured, wide faces.

At the police station, Rambo appears calm and reserved, which is juxtaposed with the officers’ chitchat amongst themselves and their hot-tempered orders directed towards Rambo. Rambo’s steely demeanour matches up well with his long, chiselled face and provides an excellent contrast towards the officers’ soft-featured, wide faces.

The officers wind up abusing Rambo due to his refusal to cooperate; however, recall that Rambo’s defiance is caused by the officers’ unjust arrogance in the first place. The only officer who appears disturbed by the sadistic treatment is the young officer, whose face is more Oval-leaning than any of the other policemen.

Rambo and the young officer Mitch (played by David Caruso)

Sadists hosing Rambo (Note Mitch is the only one not smiling)

Officer Galt to Rambo: You got about three seconds before I break your face in.

The police decide to hold Rambo down and give him a dry shave.
This triggers flashbacks of being tortured in Vietnam.

Rambo just wanted directions to a diner, yet
the officers act maliciously towards him for no justified reason.

Later in the film we meet the State Police/National Guard leader and Rambo’s former commander, Colonel Trautman. The State Police commander has a Square face, which complements officer Teasle’s round face, as well as the wide-faced Guardsmen under his command. Trautman on the other hand appears to have a Oval-leaning face, and although his skin has sagged and wrinkled from age he stands our in stark contrast to the other two men. His face also complements Rambo’s long face.

Personality-wise, Trautman is portrayed as calm and rational. This is contrary to Teasle who has a short temper and orders the manhunt to proceed recklessly despite being warned, and contrary to the State Policeman who acquiesces to Teasle, despite the fact that the manhunt may have gone out of Teasle’s jurisdiction.

State Police commander Dave Kern (played by Bill McKinney)

Colonel Trautman (played by Richard Crenna)

After the National Guardsmen trap Rambo in an abandoned mine, they become petrified in fear when he returns fire. Too cowardly to advance into the mine and capture him, they decide to blow the mine up. They mistakenly believe this kills Rambo, and proceed to celebrate by posing for a “heroic” photo which they hope will be featured in newspapers and magazines.

I ain’t going in there!

They are “posers” indeed; Rambo is the real soldier.

While Teasle and the State Police commander are willing to sacrifice the lives of their troops to capture Rambo (recall that he was originally arrested for vagrancy and was willing to surrender without bloodshed earlier!), Trautman comes alone, and offers his personal assistance as an individual. Empathetically viewing Rambo as an individual, rather than a fugitive who needs to be destroyed, an unarmed Trautman eventually walks right in front of the machine-gun-wielding Rambo and convinces him to surrender. This is just moments after the assault-rifle-wielding Teasle is pitifully gunned down.

Teasle’s arrogance manages to escalate the situation from Rambo merely asking for directions to Rambo destroying the whole town, but Trautman is able to stop Rambo.

Rambo is one of the most famous examples of a ‘freedom fighter’ character defying a corrupt system. We should ask ourselves: would Rambo have been as convincing of a hero had Dennehy, or any of the other policemen, switched roles with Stallone? If so, is it because certain face shapes correlate more strongly with the heroic archetype than others?

Originally posted by Aryan Anthropology.

Related Information: The Aryan Phenotype

Posted in film | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Humor Nazis – 22

Episode #22 – Red vs. Blue, part 1

















































































Posted in humor | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Shadows of the Demiurge II – Court History, Tribalism, & the Rotten Root

“Research must remain free and unfettered by any State restriction. The facts, which it establishes represent Truth, and Truth is never evil. It is the duty of the State to support and further the efforts of research in every way, even when its activities hold no promise of immediate, or even early, advantage from the material or economic point of view. It may well be that its results will be of value, or indeed will represent tremendous progress, only to the generation of the future.” ~Adolf Hitler, Table Talk

That quote, by its very existence, pretty much makes the point of this essay. The man deemed to have been the worst human of all time, was more open and friendly towards the issue of research, historical or otherwise, than his vanquishers have permitted be allowed concerning him. This distortion is not merely retrospective. The powers that be, High Finance in London and New York, sensed from the start that Adolf Hitler was not just another autocrat with whom they could stage a war or two and then rake in the results of carefully controlled financial bets. Thus, the distortion started right when Hitler first started to make the news and kicked into full steam when he was elected into office.

George Orwell’s take on Mein Kampf

A case study of this distortion can be seen in the form of George Orwell’s review of the English translation of Mein Kampf. [1] Orwell was passionately against tyranny, yet as with so many others, he was too shocked by Hitler’s radicalism to understand it and demonstrated some epistemic arrogance, both of which are common when taking the popular view of Hitler. For instance, Orwell mentions almost right away, “the obvious intention of the translator’s preface and notes is to tone down the book’s ferocity and present Hitler in as kindly a light as possible.” However, at the start of the next column he states that the writing of the book in question is “clumsy.” A very exemplary contradiction, which demonstrates how Hitler has been treated: he is whatever the mainstream historian needs him to be in a given moment – monster, fool, or evil genius – even within the span of one short essay. Additionally, Mein Kampf is hardly ferocious, it’s a long train of thought dictation that was typed out and this was before Hitler had achieved his now famous levels of speech mastery. Thus, it is closer to clumsy than ferocious, though really it’s just one man’s worldview at one point in time, and written out as to appeal to a wide voting demographic. Things get repeated and over-explained more than once, yet it’s still more bearable in its 640 pages than 18 months of mudslinging of a typical presidential election campaign.

Orwell than states that “both Left and Right concurred in the very shallow notion that National Socialism was merely a version of Conservatism.” They did agree to that, however that doesn’t make it true and only shows the aforementioned epistemic arrogance – they thought that they knew, they assumed after making some comfortable generalizations. This is then reinforced by Orwell’s claim that internal evidence from the text of Mein Kampf gives proof that Hitler has “rigidity of his mind, the way in which his worldview doesn’t develop” thereby making Hitler seemingly a conservative, especially when he later states, “he [Hitler] was financed by the heavy industrialists, who saw him as the main who would smash the Socialists and Communists.” What’s wrong with that assertion? The fact that Hitler was a radical Socialist, thus he challenged the rules of mainstream Socialism brought about by Marx (who advocated class warfare and a dictatorship of the proletariat) as much as he stood up to his own state’s establishment. In the end, Hitler enacted a wide-ranging revolution that united German citizens of various classes, thus creating a folk. Rich industrialists were still Germans, thus Hitler valued their potential loyalty and when he got it, he made sure they could continue their trades, albeit in a new context. Marx and Trotsky would have just killed them, yet they remain the “people’s heroes” of the mainstream Left.

Lastly, Hitler eventually wanted Mein Kampf pulled from wide circulation as he felt it was archaic and better placed in a library at that point. To this effect, even before attaining power, he compiled many of his speeches into Zweites Buch, which updates many things from Mein Kampf and there is further evolution of thought in Hitler’s Table Talk, however that wasn’t available in 1940. Zweites Buch wasn’t either, though the speeches it is based on were available to be heard and they received press coverage, yet it looks like Orwell missed them. Ironically, this means he is treating Hitler’s first book with the same dogged and dogmatic approach as is typical of neo-Nazis. Epistemic arrogance – being sure that you know more than you actually do – par exellence.

It only gets worse when Orwell proclaims that what Hitler envisages, a hundred years hence, is a continuous state of 250 million Germans with plenty of “living room” (i.e. stretching to Afghanistan or thereabouts), a horrible brainless empire in which, essentially, nothing ever happens except the training of young men for war and the endless breeding of fresh cannon-fodder.” Operation Barbarossa, the Axis attack on the USSR, never had a final goal of anywhere near Afghanistan, and even the vaguely and ominously presented Generalplanost was also never claimed to have such a goal. [2]

Finally, Orwell claims, “Hitler has said to them ‘I offer you struggle, danger and death,’ and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet.” Given the amount of sensational information available, many would be quick to take this at face value. Many web pages with Orwell’s article contain the quote and some frame it as an apt paraphrase. Hitler would have certainly meant the first, struggle, given that Germany was in dire straits when he took office, yet Orwell couldn’t resist the typical morbid spin that’s pinned onto any picture of Hitler. About two months after this Mein Kampf review, it would be Winston Churchill who would much more accurately live up to Orwell’s proclamation when he said “I have nothing to offer, but blood, toil, tears, and sweat” on May 13, 1940.

The rest of the two-column article is much in the same vein. Some would excuse it as “just wartime propaganda” and a morale booster the side producing it, which could be seen as fair, however only if the other monstrous exaggerations about Hitler and the Axis are also seen (finally) as just that.

Court History – An Old Trend

Orwell’s short article represents a broader trend in British and Western historiography, one where sensational trends are normalized and then accepted at face value. One of the most famous examples of court history is William Shakespeare’s Richard III, which was written to appease the then ruling dynasty that had won a bitter civil war before ascending to power. This was the culmination of a trend that began shortly after the king’s death and the famous Bard “was merely completing, with typical embellishment, a job already started by artists and historians – immortalising Richard III as a crookback Machiavel and implicitly championing his vanquisher, Henry VII, as founder of a heroic new dynasty: the Tudors.” However, historians who wanted a comfortable place under the new dynasts wasted no time and “portrayed Richard as an anti-Christ: born with fully grown teeth and hair, as well as uneven shoulders, the right higher [than] the left.’” For the sake of sensationalism, King Richard III’s abnormal shoulder was subsequently switched to the left “presumably to play up Richard’s sinister side (sinister being Latin for left).” This appearance “would thereafter become the norm in pictures of him, Richard has uneven shoulders, villainously thin lips and malevolently narrow eyes.[3]

Despite this sensationalism on page and stage, King Richard III’s more objective descriptions, in documents among others, show him to be “a brave and astute military leader, who also introduced the nation’s first form of legal aid[3] and that “King Richard III was more of a handsome surf dude than a hideous misfit.’”[4] Many stage productions have starred actors with large noses, performing with an intentionally poor posture, and relishing his orders to have people murdered or sent to the infamous Tower of London.

Yet, “there was nothing sinister in this – the Tower had yet to acquire its gruesome reputation and it was traditionally used by English monarchs prior to their coronations. The Woodvilles had never been popular and Richard’s actions seem to have been met with approval by other members of the late king’s household notably the Duke of Buckingham, who’d helped him at Stony Stratford, and Edward IV’s old friend William Hastings. Despite the claims of later Tudor writers, there’s no evidence that Richard’s actions up to this point were part of a plot to seize the throne and the preparations for Edward’s coronation went ahead as normal. But that would soon change.[5] And history has shown how it changed. A place with a clear function, that changed notably overtime, has been re-imagined into a death trap of a megalomaniac to please the political needs of the establishment.

Interestingly, author Jane Austen expressed her support for revisionism about Richard III and wrote, “The character of the prince has been in general very severely treated by historians, but as he was York, I am rather inclined to suppose him a very respectable man.” She refused to accept the idea that Richard III killed his nephews. [6]

Court History – Still Relevant

“We apply to the behavior of our own governments a generosity of interpretation which we do not extend to others. People regard Hitler as wicked; and then find proofs of his wickedness in evidence, which they would not use against others. Why do they apply this double standard? Only because they assume Hitler’s wickedness in the first place.” ~A.J.P Taylor, Origins of the Second World War

Much like Richard III in his time (though mostly after), Adolf Hitler has been imagined, re-imagined, and revised every which way to make him into the model evil that the post-WW2 establishment desires. George Orwell’s review of Mein Kampf is at the beginning of that still relevant trend. Orwell resorts to rather simplistic accusations of calling Hitler mad and vicious, while missing the greater picture of how the NSDAP transformed life in a chaotic and broken Germany. This last part cannot all be his fault, as the British press and government tightly controlled information about Germany. They point at Goebbels’s propaganda yet miss their own. The above A.J.P. Taylor quote really applies to all members of the NSDAP, not just Hitler. Additionally, Goebbels spent most of his time on domestic enemies and only published crude portrayals of Churchill (and others) as reactions to incidents. For instance after a Jewish drifter with little to know apparent connections or social standing, gunned down a German diplomat and than magically found himself with a defense lawyer, Goebbels suspected a greater plot, thus published a piece in the NSDAP newspaper calling several British politicians, including Churchill, “Jewish murderers.” [7]

Yet, as early as 1933, right after the NSDAP was elected into office, former German Chancellor Brüning (who was not and never became an NSDAP member) wrote that, “foreign correspondents reported that the River Spree was covered with the corpses of murdered Jews.” Yet this was an obvious (and absurd) exaggeration as Brüning also noted that, “At that time, he pointed out, hardly any Jews had suffered except for the leaders of the Communist Party.” [7] Despite not being an ally of Hitler (more of a pragmatic collaborator), Brüning was outraged at these press lies that were making Germany’s situation difficult from abroad, despite the fact that the domestic situation was beginning to calm down at that time.

This press attack continued until 1945 and the propaganda lasts to this day. It’s even come full circle back to King Richard III due to the 1995 film version of Shakespeare’s play.

The House of York is represented as with comic book fascist aesthetic, while the House of Lancaster is shown with more traditional Anglo aesthetic. Thus, many English seem to be steadily retconning their own history so much that that now they’ve apparently “defeated the Nazis” well before “the Nazis” even existed.

A much smaller example of this is the “traditional” meal called “the ploughman’s lunch,” which is a pub meal usually consisting of bread, pickles, cheese, onion, and served with a beer. The truth is that it is nothing more than a marketing gimmick that was meant to increase the sales of cheese, yet by now the notion that it’s an old part of English culture is taken as self-evident by many. There is a British film from 1983 called The Ploughman’s Lunch that actually criticizes this, since it uses the title to convey a theme of “the way countries and people re-write their own history to suit the needs of the present.” [8] The historiography surrounding King Richard III and Adolf Hitler most definitely fall into this category.

Hitler, even more so than Richard III, has been promoted as the standard for “evil psycho” so much so that we get movie quotes like this in the 1993 film The Last Action Hero:

Benedict (the film’s satirical villain):
“Since you are about to die anyway, I may as well tell you the entire plot. Think of villains, Jack. You want Dracula? Dra-cool-la? Hang on.”
[takes out the magic ticket that can summon movie characters]
“I’ll fetch him. Dracula, huh? I can get King Kong! We’ll have a nightmare with Freddy Krueger, have a surprise party for Adolf Hitler, Hannibal Lecter can do the catering, and then we’ll have a christening for Rosemary’s Baby! All I have to do is snap my fingers and they’ll be here. They’re lining up to get here and do you know why, Jack? Should I tell you why? Hmm? Because here, in this world, the bad guys can win!”

Note that Hitler is the only historical personality mentioned and all others are fictional. Interestingly, this is entirely what Hitler’s image has been reduced to and its current mainstream worth is just as much: an over-the-top fictional villain. Not enough people bother to understand him and take him in context.

Jewish filmmaker Claude Lanzmann even stated that trying to understand Hitler would be an obscenity and further stated in an interview with Le Monde on June 12, 1997 that “not understanding has been my iron law.” [9] Lanzmann’s over 8-hour film, simply titled Shoah, made no use of archival materials, just face-to-face interviews (sometimes with a hidden camera), and digging into people’s memories and emotions thus, crafting something more along the lines of a dark fairy tale, oddly one that perfectly fits into the Jewish religion, thereby making it an “aggadah” (a Jewish-told story that is recognized as Jewish canon) and not a research piece. Lanzmann proudly admitted that Shoah contains “not one second of archival material.” [9] And so, just as Judeo-Christian traditionalism before it, this “documentary’s” information is taken as sacred truth, all else is heresy. What followed was everything from Schindler’s List to the Wolfenstein series, all taken at face value.

The retrospective distortion and narrative discipline surrounding traditional Western WW2 mythos has been frighteningly impressive. People are seemingly unaware of just how many times the story has actually been reverse engineered due to new revelations, yet still presented as self-evident truth.

The Orwellian Memory Hole & Doublethink in Action

This is a form of gas-lighting and it’s clearly a part of Zionist doctrine and narrative discipline. They recreate the past and then act as if nothing’s ever changed. Orwell also addressed this, albeit after the war, in the anti-Soviet book 1984 with the following passage: “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” The Potemkin villages, architectural follies, and highly stylized presentations at camp museums such as Auschwitz and Majdanek are all part of this phenomenon.

Mainstream and politically correct historiography focus only through this artificial prism and thus only ever see atrocity, repression, resistance, dissent, and never the genuine social situation and considerably raised living standards brought about by the NSDAP, the diplomatic efforts by Hitler to secure allies, and the struggle against Materialism and Consumerism, Communism and Capitalism.

George Orwell would be terrified of the mythos he participated in creating if he knew just was he involved in at the time of his Mein Kampf review.

The Rotten Root of the Western Mind

Numbers 33-52Israel’s viciousness explained
“Drive out all the inhabitants of the land before you. Destroy all their carved images and their cast idols, and demolish all their high places.”

Deuteronomy 7-5Israel’s viciousness further explained
“This is what you are to do them: Break down their altar, smash their sacred stones, cut down their Asherah poles and burn their idols in the fire.”

Deuteronomy 7-6the “chosen people” idea
“For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession.”

Deuteronomy 9-14Only Islam has violent fanatics?
“Let me alone, so that I may destroy them and blot out their name from under heaven.”

Deuteronomy 20-16Zionist plan for the Middle East
“For in the cities of these peoples that the Lord your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes.”

A religion that bases itself around such ideas cannot be regarded as peaceful. While Christianity and Islam also embrace, to a degree, the same book, for those religions it is only a part – a historically contested one, at that – of their canon. People like the Cathars have interpreted Christianity solely around the charismatic personality of Jesus, as did Thomas Jefferson with The Jefferson Bible [10]. Yet, these efforts were regarded as heresy and killed off (in spirit of the above quotes) or forgotten. For all the fuss about Islam, less than one percent of Muslims are supporters of fanatical interpretations of their faith, as with Christians. With over a billion believing members (of all stripes) that 1% is numerically enough people to give the sensationalism-seeking media a lot of fuel.

The problem is that, per capita a great number of Jews are openly supportive, defensive about, or willfully ignorant (thereby tacitly complicit) in the violence that their religion breeds and spreads. Ku Klux Klan Christians members and ISIS Islamist fighters (perfectly capturing the spirit of the Old Book) are violent, though mostly honest about their actions and intentions.

Fanatical Jews are not. They hold professorships, positions in finance and government, the media, and the whole swath of influential fields. Thus, with a religion that views and openly professes its members to be an exclusive inner-circle to the deity that created everything, it is no surprise they interpret everything and continually act through that prism. One dead Palestinian (or any-non Jew) is almost always brushed off as “at the wrong place at the wrong time” or “a possible terrorist” while a dead Jew is always a “victim of ever present anti-Semitism and hate.”

Judaism is the ultimate example of “us vs. them.” The entire religion is built around this premise. And so, the Jewish religion always needs an Amalek to compare goyim to. The Amalekites were a tribe massacred by the Ancient Hebrews (according to their canon) and this is seen as a good thing, since YHWH commanded the Hebrews to do it.

Deuteronomy 25:17-19
“Remember what the Amalekites did to you along the way when you came out of Egypt. When you were weary and worn out, they met you on your journey and attacked all who were lagging behind; they had no fear of God. When the Lord your God gives you rest from all the enemies around you in the land he is giving you to possess as an inheritance, you shall blot out the name of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget!”

That story, Jewish religious canon, has been taken at the word of rabbis and priests and imams for centuries. One could argue that it is one of the corner stones of what is commonly dubbed “Western Civilization.” The modern American notion of rooting for the underdog can even be seen as a distant echo of this and other originally Jewish stories, such as David and Goliath. Yet modern research and rationalism (often dubbed “hate speech”) has largely disproven this, or rather proven it to be simply a story. There is not only no historical veracity for the Book of Exodus, there is even substantial reason to believe that labor in Ancient Egypt [11] was far different from the toils of slavery typically presented. [12]

Think about it: the Tanakh, along with all the clerics who support it and claim it to be a foundational element of the modern word are totally lying. This is far beyond things such as fan-based cosplay (really a form of religion) that seemingly takes story characters too seriously. No one has launched a war in the name of Samus Aran or Aragorn, however in the name of the Covenant with YHWH millions have perished throughout history and continue to do so today. Those claiming to be the moral base of Western Civilization are rotten and so is their biggest creation.

The echoes of fallacy ring abundantly in Jewish tribal mythology.

Daniel 3:19-23the original “Holocaust” tale?
“Then Nebuchadnezzar was furious with Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, and his attitude toward them changed. He ordered the furnace heated seven times hotter than usual and commanded some of the strongest soldiers in his army to tie up Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego and throw them into the blazing furnace. So these men, wearing their robes, trousers, turbans and other clothes, were bound and thrown into the blazing furnace. The king’s command was so urgent and the furnace so hot that the flames of the fire killed the soldiers who took up Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, and these three men, firmly tied, fell into the blazing furnace.”

If that bears any resemblance to any “Holocaust” stories you may have heard before, it’s no coincidence. The echoes of fallacy ring abundant in Judaism. One over-the-top and martyr-obsessed story follows another and each time shock value covers up the stupid. These days, many Jews are conceding that those morbid old stories are just stories and legends, yet the core of Judaism remains the same and it still needs an Amalek, a Pharoah, a Nebuchadnezzar, a Hitler – a singular image to satisfy its masochistic need for the endless suffering of their ancestors that has given Jews their purpose since the inception of their cult. These tales are the “aggadahs” (Jewish stories that are recognized as Jewish canon) and provide a great deal of slithery maneuverability for the ever evolving and self-serving Jewish tribal mythology.

“They presume to be God’s only people, to condemn all the world, and they expect that their arrogance and boasting will please God, that he should repay them with a Messiah of their own choosing and prescription.” ~Martin Luther, On the Jews & Their Lies

Hitler is the latest incarnation of Amalek; therefore any and every bit of information about him, which conflicts with the YHWH cult’s purpose is to be effaced from record and replaced with the lurid and false. Oddly, the Jews accuse Amalek (in all of his incarnations) of trying to do just that and thus the villains in their tales often act like this:

Xerxes (in a very fictionalized rendition):
There will be no glory in your sacrifice. I will erase even the memory of Sparta from the histories! Every piece of Greek parchment shall be burned. Every Greek historian, and every scribe shall have their eyes pulled out, and their tongues cut from their mouths. Why, uttering the very name of Sparta, or Leonidas, will be punishable by death! The world will never know you existed at all!

Zionist Correctness and censorship seem to be on the way of perfectly resembling their own version of the ultimate villain! Yet, in the 300, the Persian Empire is said to consist “of a thousand nations” (with one absolute monarch) and it is attacking a small, ethnic enclave – this rings “Israeli fantasy” more than anything and the sequel, 300: Rise of an Empire even had an Israeli director. It’s no coincidence that Iran, Israel’s biggest geopolitical rival, was depicted with Israeli and Western approval as so vicious. Just imagine is Iran released a fictionalized account of the past, however one that favor’s Iran’s image at the expense of Israel: the Zionist outcry would be deafening, “it’s not free speech, it’s hate speech,” etc.

Rays of Hope – Old & New

Despite all of Western Civilization’s retrospective distortion & narrative discipline about Hitler, Islam, and everything “non-Western,” one can find within that mass many positive things that could very well lead to the reformation of or total revolution within Western Civilization. For example, little do most people know, the image of Ancient Israel (as depicted in Jewish canon) was reviled in the early United States:

“Could we permit ourselves to suppose that the Almighty would distinguish any nation of people by the name of His chosen people, we must suppose that people to have been an example to all the rest of the world of the purest piety and humanity, and not such a nation of ruffians and cut-throats as the ancient Jews were; a people who, corrupted by and copying after such monsters and impostors as Moses and Aaron, Joshua, Samuel and David, had distinguished themselves above all others on the face of the known earth for barbarity and wickedness. If we will not stubbornly shut our eyes and steel our hearts, it is impossible not to see, in spite of all that long-established superstition imposes upon the mind, that the flattering appellation of His chosen people is no other than a lie which the priests and leaders of the Jews had invented to cover the baseness of their own characters, and which Christian priests, sometimes as corrupt and often as cruel, have professed to believe.” ~Thomas Paine, US Founder, in The Age of Reason

This distrust and outright disgust with the Jewish religion and its related concepts should have become the norm for the new and transforming American culture. The culture and ideas to originally develop in the Americas were also ones in philosophical opposition to the Demiurge YHWH of the Jews. As noted above, Thomas Jefferson created his own version of the Bible by putting together just the story of Jesus and his parables. [10] Another good example of this can be seen in Chief Seattle’s words to the Federal Government, which requested permission to buy some of the Chief’s people’s lands. [13]

“Your God is not our God! Your God loves your people and hates mine!”

“The white man’s God cannot love our people or He would protect them.”

“The Red Man has ever fled the approach of the White Man, as the morning mist flees before the morning sun. However, your proposition seems fair and I think that my people will accept it and will retire to the reservation you offer them. Then we will dwell apart in peace, for the words of the Great White Chief seem to be the words of nature speaking to my people out of dense darkness.”

“Your time of decay may be distant, but it will surely come, for even the White Man whose God walked and talked with him as friend to friend, cannot be exempt from the common destiny. We may be brothers after all. We will see.

Joseph Campbell, in his book, The Power of Myth [14], presents an idealized version of Chief Seattle’s words – ones that more perfectly fit his over all message – yet their underlying theme is strikingly similar. The Chief points out the that the “white man’s” god is exclusive and not universal, while Campbell points out the hypocrisy intrinsic to the Tanakh or Old Testament.

“The Ten Commandments say, ‘Thou shalt not kill.’ Then the next chapter says, ‘Go into Canaan and kill everybody in it.’ This is a bounded field. The myths of participation and love only pertain to the in-group, and the out-group is totally other. This is the sense of the word ‘gentile’ – the person is not of the same order.” ~Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth

Both of their descriptions (one tacit, the other direct) of YHWH, also imply a need for cooperation across conventional (e.g. tribal) boundaries, which is essentially folkism, a common future. This is in stark contrast to how Judeo-Christian-inspired colonialism treated the new peoples that it happened upon, seeing them as objects of exploitation instead the call for unity and cooperation, which is what Chief Seattle condemns and warns about. The Chief even announces that he still holds trust in, and thus potential cooperation with, European-Americans despite his people having suffered; again stark contrast to the Judaic nature of “war-cry in the struggle with other nations” as Schopenhauer put it. Similarly, Campbell, despite being raised in a traditional Catholic home, realizes the nature of that religion. He spends much of The Power of Myth discussing how universal heroic myths are and, in fact, should be seen, so as to unite across conventional lines.

“We need myths that will identify the individual not with his local group but with the planet.” – page 30

“Is the hero of a given state or people what we need today, when the whole planet should be our field of concern?” – page 155

“Today there is no out-group anymore on the planet. And the problem of modern religions is to have such compassion work for the whole of humanity.” – page 215

Campbell also goes so far as to say that the Founders of the USA “did not believe in the Fall” along with the fact that the motto “In God We Trust” doesn’t refer to “the god of the Bible” [14] (YHWH), rather a universal transcendence to which all people can connect, thus outright saying that the founding principles of the Unites States of America were Gnostic, not Judeo-Christian.

American architecture – all that’s missing is a Swastika!

Not surprisingly, Campbell has been accused of “anti-Semitism” despite only criticizing the Jewish religion (and even that, rather indirectly), yet the Tribe always seek to nip in the bud anything that could threaten their hegemony of accepted ideas, aka Western Civilization. Thus, it is even less of a surprise that a work exalting a universal heroic myth for the new century, a myth across conventional lines of ethnicity (thus no room for a “chosen people”), was instantly targeted by those who would lose out from it. In fact, what has commonly been called “European anti-Semitism” with the likes of Luther, Goethe, Fichte, Schopenhauer, and others can be seen in Paine’s and Campbell’s words in their refusal to exalt the Tanakh/Old Testament and in fact call it outright vicious. Even more interesting is that ideas directly compatible with those thinkers and philosophers were present in the Americas and they were the norm before Western Traditionalists stamped them out.

Despite the insistent narrative discipline of America being Judeo-Christian – only the dominant and currently most corrupt faction is – there are other viewpoints that, in varying degrees, wean towards idealistic folkism, or ones that can be seen as stepping stones towards that ideal. These must be rallied to rebuild a new American Folk, one more along the lines of what Chief Seattle tacitly suggested and Campbell outright said.

We can start this by a less dogmatic and much more intuitive approach to the current foundations of morality and history. The big thing here is redefining who and what is good and who and what is bad. Given who owns the press, it is not difficult to figure out why we’re bashed over the head with “evil Hitler messages” on a regular and frequent basis.

One’s real, the other’s fake – which one do you see?

Nevertheless, even in this mainstream morass there are some glowing embers worth noting. One of these is RHS Stolfi’s 2011 biography titled, Hitler: Beyond Evil & Tyranny, which is the first major work on Adolf Hitler to not hold pre-existing antipathy towards its monumental subject. AJP Taylor, as quote above, was the first to present this idea, however Stolfi has based his entire examination with this in mind, noting that, “the conventional wisdom fails us on both fronts. With stubborn uniformity, it presents Hitler as a one-sidedly shabby, wicked figure who coveted power, and it presents the historical situation as one in which a legally bedecked European status quo of 1919 had come under attack by a German leader with the qualities of an international criminal.” And also more succinctly with, “The point of such a critique is that the biographers feel compelled to take liberties with Hitler that are unheard of in virtually any other similarly important historical figure.[15]

Basically, the entire Western, and largely also World, understanding of Hitler has been wrong and very obviously influenced by Judaism’s selective ethics and morality that are the rotten root of Western Civilization. “The hunt for Hitler has been for the wrong man in the wrong historical background” and with the wrong expectations. Hitler was against Western Civilization, or at the very least, at what it had become, therefore applying Western standards in judging and analyzing him can’t work. Hitler was outside of the corrupt Western power structures that his contemporaries – Roosevelt, Churchill, Lenin, DeGaulle, and others – were all an intrinsic part of. “It would be tempting to argue that Hitler had become dictator and, like all dictators in all times and places, had become subject to the influence of cabals and court favorites in making high political policy. Perhaps uniquely in history, Hitler escaped this universal condition. He was under the influence of no other man and cannot be said to have been constrained either by democratic constitution or Communist-style central committee.[15]

This very obvious example of supreme individualism in Hitler is then used to denigrate him. “In a word, the biographers handle Hitler as if he should have been a well-educated lawyer, social scientist, or aristocrat bred for imperial leadership rather than the informally educated but intense, willful, imaginative artist and messianic personality that he was.” [15]

And as far as Americanism is concerned: “The writers in these established democracies and others like the United States denigrate Hitler for his lack of formal education, his rude family environment, and his exaggerated dreams of success. Ironically, these characteristics read like the semi-mythical “American dream” wherein the young man with limited formal education, rude background, and dreams of success triumphs.” And then we can examine Hitler’s implementation of a new – totally new – regime based on the ideas of idealistic nationalism and the folk community, which is also denounced as vicious and unfair, yet, as Stolfi rightfully points out (the rather obvious): “The Russian Revolution as directed by Lenin, notwithstanding, or perhaps as proven by, its final consolidation under Josef Stalin, stands as clumsy, brutal, and misdirected (i.e., at the wrong time and place, but nevertheless bloodily pushed through). Hitler intended a similarly fulsome revolution and has been interpreted as a one-dimensional crude and brutal propagandist, but his seizure of power stands as a monumental address to practical reality and historical continuity. And in contrast to the Communist revolution in Russia and the Communist attempts at revolution in Germany from 1918 through 1923, Hitler’s were virtually bloodless. This is then compounded by the fact that in 1933 when Hitler finally entered the ranks of the German government, charisma and all, he would “proceed later in the year to seize power with the bloodless yet revolutionary synchronization of much of German affairs with the party.” [15]

Diving right into such a nuanced and much more realistic picture of Hitler, that commends his military service in WW1; his tastes and knowledge of art, opera, and architecture; his unusual, yet remarkable work discipline; as well as his general respectful attitude toward everyone may be a bit much for people who have been force fed the usual. Thus, as a soft starter to revisionism, the curious reader can watch the excellent episode on CorbettReport titled, History Is Written By The Winners. [16] This concerns the First World War, yet it goes well with the second section of this essay concerning the fact that court history is an old trend.

For those looking to dive into the deep end, I would recommend the excellent book, Lectures on the Holocaust – Controversial Issues Cross Examined by Germar Rudolf, which details the flaws in the way the Holocaust phenomenon is taught with its selective and highly subjective views akin to what is done with studies on Hitler.

“The fact is that Langbein, as a communist and a long-time Chairman of the Auschwitz Committee, played a central role in terms of Auschwitz propaganda not just during the war, but afterwards as well. It is also interesting that the Auschwitz Committee was first headquartered in Polish – i.e., Stalinist-ruled – Krakow: it was therefore clearly a Stalinist organization.” [17]

To be clear (and fair to them), the aforementioned researchers, the late R.H.S. Stolfi, James Corbett, and Germar Rudolf (despite the latter’s incarceration for his work) are not supporters of National Socialism. Nevertheless, all of their work challenges the rotten root of Western Civilization in much the way Hitler’s did and this only speaks to National Socialism’s universal nature, as opposed to tribal and/or cult exclusivity.

A loyal soldier of National Socialism had this to say: [18]
A true National Socialist and idealist, not a neo-Nazi parroting Jewish tribalism.

Concluding Remarks

The issue with revisionism, and it’s always been the case throughout history, is that it negatively affects those in power and the masses do not perceive the good that they can get out of it. Thus, the problems it tries to address are largely unnoticed or misunderstood. And when it comes to addressing problems, be they historical, environmental, or traffic statistics, if there isn’t some catastrophic example it remains difficult to grab people’s attention. The problem with revisionism concerning the greatest personality of the 20th Century is that the problems stemming from his defeat are much of the fabric of the current world system – Communism and post-Communist regimes (cosmetic changes only) in much of the world, Zionism in the Eastern Mediterranean that serves as model for tribalists everywhere, the continued shadow hegemony of world finance – and thus never seen as having one root. The necks of the hydra are visible, while the body they share remains unseen. The greatest power of this hydra is silencing discussions on the fact that it is, in fact, a hydra and not a mishmash of random or maybe related serpents.


[1] From The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, Volume 2 (1968)

[2] Inconvenient History, Three Aspects of the German Deportation of European Jews into the Occupied Eastern Territories, 1941-1944 – July 7, 2013

[3] The Telegraph, Richard III: Visions of a Villain? – Jan 20, 2013

[4] Daily Mail, King Richard III was not a grotesque hunchback but actually a handsome gentleman with a ‘surf dude’ vibe, expert says – Nov 21, 2018

[5] History Revealed, Richard III: Ruthless tyrant or maligned monarch? – May 2017

[6] History Revelead, 5 Facts about… Richard III – Feb 4, 2014

[7] David Irving, Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich, pg 293 (1994)

[8] BFI Screen Online: Ploughman’s Lunch The (1983)

[9] The Journal of Historical Review, “The Dictatorship of Imbecility” – Nov.-Dec. 1997 (Vol. 16, No. 6), pages 8-10.

[10] Thomas Jefferson, The Jefferson Bible (1820)

[11] Exodus Debunked: Slave trade was not common in Ancient Egypt – (June 2, 2017)

[12] Reuters, Egypt tombs suggest pyramids not built by slaves – (January 11, 2010)

[13] Chief Seattle’s Treaty Oration (1854), translated & published in Seattle paper in 1887

    • Version 1 – first translation, most authentic version from 1887
    • Version 2 – purported to be from 1855, published 1983
    • Version 3 – purported to be from 1885

[14] Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth (1988)

[15] R.H.S. Stolfi, Hitler: Beyond Evil & Tyranny (2011)

[16] CorbettReport, Episode 350 – History Is Written By The Winners (December 14, 2018)

[17] Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust – Controversial Issues Cross-Examined, pg 314 (2010, 2017)

[18] Radio Islam, Interview with General Otto-Ernst Remer with Al-Shaab in July of 1993

Posted in history, Kampf | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

House Cleaning – aka updates

There have been several updates all around the blog.

Updated Pages:
Media 1 & Media 2, the former of which includes a new video.
An update of an old NS activism classic.

Also new pages that were put up without announcement, so here it is belated.

Posted in update | Tagged ,

Humor Nazis – 21

Episode #21 – Memery Lane

Big Papa Bearaboo★☭ is appalled at his brood

The Bearaboo’s★☭ basis for its Worldview has unraveled.

Paradoxically, the Bearaboo’s★☭ sworn enemy, yet spiritual twin.

One of these two guys is the daddy of the Right Wing Fatass above.

Posted in propaganda | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Shadows of the Demiurge I – Technology, Transhumanism, & Zionism

Technology is something that often causes “wow” impressions on people. With all of its wonders, lights, and theoretical possibilities people frequently get swept up into a dream world by the prospects that technology seems to offer. From there, it simply becomes a race to develop and produce more technology for one’s own benefit, for leisure and pleasure, and for power over others. The current massive wave of technology that we face undoubtedly has some useful elements within it, yet it is also, in many ways, a resurgence of the mercantilist mindset that dominated the Colonial Era where “more was better” regardless of how it was achieved.

Thus, we have come from money and profit being worshiped – the Wall Street Stock Exchange in New York was built to resemble the Parthenon – to technology and development taking its place and being proclaimed a “savior” for mankind.

Many proverbial whips have been offered to chase these new profiteers out and prevent their limitless expansion, one of which will be examined closely here and others touched upon, however we will need a real and practical whip soon.

Enslavement via Technology

In Harlan Ellison’s dark and telling short story, I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream, the author quickly sketches an extreme, though a logical extreme, toward which unchecked, power and profit driven technological advancement is compelling humanity to push itself. The background is that at some point during the Cold War of the 20th Century, the major powers – being the US, USSR, and China – built massive supercomputers to coordinate their armed forces in preparation for war, and then actually make critical decisions during the war itself. With humans pushed out of the decision making process, the computers did all they knew how to do: prepare for and manage war. They started to learn as geometric rates, which itself is a version of unchecked progress all in the name of progress itself, and humanity met its fate. The massive computers designed solely for war planning and contingency shuffled the chessboard for a total slaughter.

The American Alliance’s (probably something akin to NATO) supercomputer, bluntly named Allied Mastercomputer, or AM, became the last one standing of the super-computers and used its massive and expanding learning capability to subdue the remaining members of humanity. It is unclear whether AM is the original Allied supercomputer or an assimilation of one or more of the others, either way, this machine solely designed to expand its knowledge and plan for conquest now controls the entire Earth. It has become self-aware and is knowledgeable about its history to at least knowing that humans made it and thus put it into the current and very bleak predicament, and thus it hates all humans.

The details of the story’s world are given in a disordered and confusing fashion, which aptly reflects the world of the human characters who are left at the whim of AM. These humans are the only five humans left to exist and, using its massive amount of accumulated knowledge, AM keeps them alive in a perpetually dour existence. It does this intentionally as it cannot create life, only sustain it and manipulate it. One of the story’s characters, Benny, has been reduced to a simian-like form and his sexual orientation was changed to desire women. The only woman in the world, Ellen, formerly a modest lady, now craves sex with Benny. The others have also been altered by is various ways by AM. However, the narrator, Ted, claims to be the only one not to have been altered in anyway, yet he exhibits paranoia and various delusions thus suggesting that he has in fact been altered. This also implies that the story has an unreliable narrator, which further suggests humans completely losing their willpower and being submitted to a fate given to them by their former technological tools. This fate is an effective immortality, albeit for the sole purpose of being perpetually tortured in some sort of facility where nothing, not its size and dimensions, not even the flow of time, is a sure thing as AM continually changes the characters’ perceptions or sometimes leaves them seemingly alone for unspecified amounts of time.

Eventually, the characters decide to look for some food, which they are convinced must be somewhere within the massive building complex. AM has been keeping them next to starvation and periodically giving them intentionally disgusting food as part of its continual abuse. Much to their surprise, they find some canned food in an icy cave, but then immediately realize that they have no way to open the cans. Benny then attacks Gorrister, one of his four co-inhabitants, and tries to eat him. It is here that Ted realizes the solution to their nightmarish plight: the only way out is death. AM is an entity of this world and not the next nor is it a transcendent power. It can only manipulate, alter, reorganize, and reshuffle in an endless string of permutations, but not actually create. Ted takes an icy stalactite and impales his two fellow prisoners as they fight. Ellen, coming to the same realization as Ted, then kills Nimdok, the fourth man, only to be herself then killed by Ted, who is unable to take his exit as he is stopped by AM. The supercomputer is furious and even its previous seemingly limitless antagonism is now “not even a shadow of the hate he now slavered from every printed circuit.” A very telling choice is words, AM is both master of the world and slave to its own empty existence, it is the newest incarnation of the Demiurge.

For revenge, AM has altered Ted into “a great soft jelly thing” that can only see and also move slowly, but is unable to harm himself, thus unable to commit suicide and leave the material world via death. The story’s title comes from Ted’s final lament as he realizes that he is trapped forever and this thought itself may have come hundreds of years after the events described in the story.

This painfully sullen picture of a future dominated by technology that humans initially created for their own protection is also present in The Terminator film series as SkyNet, which is also a supercomputer that takes over the world. It almost fits as back-story to Ellison’s short story. The themes of danger posed from technological dependence and endless development are clearly present in both.

It is interesting to note that what are called “developed” countries are held as a standard for “non” or “under” developed countries to aspire to, yet it must be noted that this notion is mainly put forth by said “developed” countries, which are mainly looking for new markets to export to or resources to mine to satisfy their own increasingly massive material needs. They do this knowing that mass industrialization is harmful – for one, just look at China’s environment – however it seems irresistible to them. They know the danger, yet crave the power just like the character Boromir in The Lord of the Rings. This is called Boromir Syndrome, or being content with something wrong, so long as you get to, or think you can, control it. In practice this is conceding to play the enemy’s game and as we can see, this leads to the destruction, not triumph, of the will.

Technology as the Demiurge

In Ellison’s story, there are several references to Old Testmanent/Tanakh events, such as AM appearing as a burning bush, or sending locusts and other plague-like disasters. The latter are likened to masturbation, thus the machine is pleasuring itself by causing endless dismay to sentient beings, this is creator of the material world who seeks to keep all souls trapped – it is YHWH, the deity worshipped by Judaism, Judeo-Christianity, and Traditionalist Islam. AM’s consistent torments of its subjects certainly echo the sadistic trials YHWH unleashed on those it wanted to worship it. Both are jealous and power-hungry gods that teach – or rather, enforce – obedience using violence and brutality.

With the decline in the influence of the traditional YHWH-centered religions, as well as the steady erosion of the auxiliary religion of the Holocaust, which is essentially a repetition of the Tanakh’s obsession with mass murder, the Demiurge has prepared to hedge its bets. Judaism has done this before with the transformation from Pharisee Judaism to Rabbinical Judaism.

The experiment of overtly Jewish-led Communism failed in the USSR, though Jews were heavily involved with Communism throughout the Cold War. Consider that the only two US Citizens convicted of treason and sentenced to death during the Cold War, were the Jews Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were handing over US state secrets to the USSR. Humanism, with the Holocaust providing ideological background, seems to be the main attempt to keep mainstream ideas Judeo-compatible, yet there is a sinister new activity taking shape, and that’s Transhumanism, or the next level of Humanism. The Tanakh/Old Testament allusions in Ellison’s work show that he was aware, on some level, where such soul crushing ideas stem from, even if he didn’t state it outright as others did.

“In the entire Old Testament we find no trace of belief in immortality, unless it be the reflection of the proven outward effect of the Persians on the Jews during the banishment. The Jewish aim is the creation of a paradise on earth. For this purpose, as is stated in the later holy books, the righteous (that is, the Jews) will creep into the promised land from their graves all over the world, emerging through holes bored in the earth by unknown forces solely for them. The Targum, the Midraschim, and the Talmud describe with delight this magnificent state of affairs in the expected paradise. The chosen people will then rule over the entire world. All other peoples will become its slaves.” ~Alfred Rosenberg, Myth of the XX Century

The figurehead of the Transhumanist movement is Ray Kurzweil. This movement pushes for a fusion of the human body with technology to create the Singularity. Sounds catchy, yet for all of its dazzling promises of human betterment via eternal life, the practical implication is the creation of a mass of cyborg-golems to be controlled by those who wield the keys to the technology. The Transhumanists wish to be the new ruling cast representing the Demiurge on Earth as the Pharisees, Rabbis, and Commissars before them.

The Singularity was also indirectly, yet aptly, described in Brave New World with citizens being test tube babies for predestined social function, thus only bred to serve, not programmed to serve, however this book was written before the advent of computerization. Though it is computers that have made that kind of enslavement more easily possible and this is currently being realized through Transhumanism. A more fantasy (as opposed to sci-fi) version of this was seen in Saruman’s magic in The Lord of the Rings with Orcs being “upgraded” to Uruk-Hai, though this actually seems like a step after Transhumanism’s (or Transorcism’s) initial implementation as Orcs are already golems, made from Earthly materials, thus making them much like the humans in Ellison’s short story, who are so far along the path of technological manipulation that their original forms are forgotten and irrelevant.

There is a computer game based on I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream, which Ellison helped make, and there are significant expansions of each character’s backstory. The most interesting of these is the fleshing out of Nimdok, which contains an odd bit of revisionism. Nimdok is a former “Nazi scientist” (a very persistent trope) who gave up his Jewish parents to the Third Reich and was thus able to pursue his scientific ambitions uninterrupted. Now, research has revealed the details of how the III Reich treated Jews, and it wasn’t as clear-cut as the mainstream makes out, but this bit really seems like trolling the establishment (or the ZioNazi canard) and it’s conveniently hidden among many accepted tropes, namely that Nimdok helped develop the initial version of the technologies that would become Allied Mastercomputer, thus tacitly linking AM to “Nazi evil.” In the game, Nimdok can be seen to still have a Third Reich flag, however the Swastika has been replaced with the letters “AM” – his new god, which tasks him with finding the “lost tribe” further connecting AM to YHWH.

As a result of this characterization, Nimdok actually serves as a good example of the “extremely efficient pack of traitors in Germany itself” as stated by Savitiri Devi in The Lightning and the Sun. These soldiers, such as Heinrich Himmler, gave up on the struggle of National Socialism to pursue their own ends thus suggesting their hearts were never completely with National Socialism. While “AM” replacing the Swastika on the Third Reich flag is somewhat predictable in dystopian science fiction that often makes use of “Nazi references” however awkward and this is certainly one of those. Though, the key point is that a computer can never replace the symbol of the Sun. In fact, “AM” is much more appropriate as a replacement for the Soviet Hammer and Sickle or the Masonic Square and Compass as AM, being a computer, is also a tool, a physical reality and not a symbol and transcendence.

Technology as Supplement – an Aryan Ideal

“It is a characteristic of our materialistic epoch that our scientific education shows a growing emphasis on what is real and practical: such subjects, for instance, as applied mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc. Of course they are necessary in an age that is dominated by industrial technology and chemistry, and where everyday life shows at least the external manifestations of these. But it is a perilous thing to base the general culture of a nation on the knowledge of these subjects. On the contrary, that general culture ought always to be directed towards ideals.”
~Adolf Hitler, Table Talk

Hitler clearly had an understanding of the danger that technology poses to a safe human existence. He even ordered the German atomic weapons project abandoned in 1942, since at the time calculations showed that the destruction possible from the new weapons would be far greater than it was and could very likely have far reaching and uncontrollable effects. This turned out a bit different after the US tested and used atomic weapons, yet largely true. While large swaths of the atmosphere didn’t combust into a global firestorm, there are the lingering effects of radiation that have rendered sites of atomic (and nuclear) tests and accidents (e.g. Chernobyl) largely uninhabitable. Hitler chose to focus on technology whose effects could be better predicted and managed, hence the V2 and other famous weapons systems.

He must have also been aware of the emerging threat of technocracy, which is any society whose functionality has become dependent on the operation of some system of specialist technology, thus undermining the state in a permutation of the way financial interests do. National Socialism insists on the centralization of authority under a singular leadership, thus a National Socialist state should never become a technocracy. Just as the state must control the issuance of currency to prevent financial cartels from forming, the state should also control introduction of new technologies. This can be challenging since while it is relatively easy to remove excess money from circulation, it requires much more effort to remove technology once it has become rooted in everyday things. Thus, before a state can meet this challenge, it must have a fixed and rigorously defined ideological vision as to what kind of technology is acceptable.

Aryanism proposes the following:
Technology that eases existing burdens is noble; technology that tempts new desires is ignoble. Technology that saves time and energy is noble; technology that consumes time and energy is ignoble. Technology that simplifies life is noble; technology that convolutes life is ignoble. We can hence broadly distinguish between the Aryan technology of automation (derived from roots “auto-” + “mat-” meaning “spontaneously acting”) is motivated by the will to freedom, however the non-Aryan technology of machinery (derived from root “magh-” meaning “to have power”) is motivated by the will to power.

“Technical progress, in all fields in which it does not automatically imply cruelty towards man or beast (or plant), is not a bad thing in itself.” ~Savitiri Devi, The Lightning & The Sun

Herding and hunting are all about the will to power. Hunters to hunt more and bigger prey, and Herders to herd more goyim more efficiently. Both value automation for its convenience, but especially enjoy machinery due to its increasing and expanding of capabilities thus being able to do more herding and hunting.

Farming is all about the will to freedom. It doesn’t dominate, nor depend on, any sentient creatures. Rather it enters into a complementary relationship with certain animals. Ethical farming also seeks, almost exclusively, automation for a more energy efficient process to provide for the community and its needs. This is Solar Civilization, which is about relying solely on the daily sunlight coming to the earth, that would be wasted if not harnessed, and thereby establishing an increase in the quantity of usable energy per land area and per time. This is done without capacity for indefinite storage and thus without the potential for hoarding.

With this ideological vision, we can begin to explore existing technologies that fit the above definitions, in particular the definite of “automation.” One of the simplest automations is the water wheel, as well as the windmill. They both harness existing energy, as opposed to using fuel, and provide an essential function in an agrarian society: the milling of grain.

Helpful technology

More agrarian compatible technology

From collecting solar rays, to focusing and collecting them

What we should use space for, if at all.

“The great tragedy for man is that he understands the mechanism of things, but the things themselves remain an enigma to him. We are capable of distinguishing the component parts of a molecule. But when it’s a question of explaining the why of a thing, words fail us. And that’s what leads men to conceive of the existence of a superior power. If I have an observatory built at Linz, I’ll have the following words carved on its front: ‘The heavens proclaim the glory of the eternal.’ It’s marvelous that this is how mankind formed the idea of God.” ~Adolf Hitler, Table Talk

Technology – From Idea to Vision & Ideal

The next step to consider would be how we could put this all into play. Given the nature of urbanization and accompanying proleterianization with more and more people living in massive cities, makes the wide implementation of these simple technology systems difficult if not impossible. Thus, we need to reconsider the modern mode of urban living. The truth is that those who saw the rise of ever taller and sprawling industrial cities as disastrous have done already. For one, J.R.R. Tolkien showed Isengard under Saruman as a massive orc-golem foundry that tore up much of the neighboring forest for fuel, and later Saruman’s treatment of the Hobbits’ Shire was very similar. This latter part is present only in the book version, however it appears to Frodo as a brief vision in the film version of Fellowship of the Ring. This was directly related to his aversion of mass industrialization in large swaths of the English countryside.

However, a real world and practical example would be American architect Frank Lloyd Wright’s urban plan for what he called “Broadacre City.”

Somebody, please make this in MineCraft as step to getting it actually made!

Wright’s purpose behind this intriguing model was to combat what he termed “the tyranny of the skyscraper” that was in his time becoming ever present in American cities. Therefore, he proposed a simple plan for a countryside town with all the essentials. This model could easily be expanded to also include local farmland for purposes of self-sufficiency, as well as a small amount of local industry to fit into the greater context of a state or realm. Daily power generation could also be largely local with the previously shown technologies integrated into the town, both small scale on individual homes and larger scale all linked to a network. This way, these towns will essentially be like the former star fort towns, albeit less fortified, thus able to fit into the current age.

“In the United States, the concentration of capital has proceeded at a most rapid tempo. Giant grain mills and mammoth slaughterhouses to which raw materials stream from over the whole land overburden the railway network. Freight costs increase the price of ready-made goods. These problems could have been avoided by the erection of fewer large centers from the start. [Henry] Ford, for example, rightly demanded that cotton mills should not be built in the capital cities, but laid out in the neighborhood of the cotton fields themselves.”
~Alfred Rosenberg, Myth of the XX Century

The state must take an active role for this reorganization and, in effect, reversion to take place. The Third Reich proposed an analogous concept of small settlements with “Wehrbauer” or “soldier peasants.” A hypothetical Broadacre City should have a local militia (self-defense is part of autarky), though the focus can certainly be less “wild west” in spirit. Rosenberg further noted that decentralization must occur in the whole of economic life and this means the reduction and reorganization of the enormous urbanized areas that have amassed an enormous, unproductive, and welfare-dependent proleteriat; or people who could be made much happier if they had breathing room and the ability to provide for themselves and their local communities, which need to be smaller to be manageable locally as such.

“The constant effort towards population, which is found to act even in the most vicious societies, increases the number of people before the means of subsistence are increased.”
~Thomas Malthus, Essay on the Principle of Population

People wouldn’t need welfare or food stamps if they could grow or easily locally purchase their own food from a number of local producers. War or disaster time rationing may demand the use of food stamps, however on a daily basis, they are not – rather should not – be needed. And citizens should consider it a failure of state administration in such a case. Mass industrialization and mass urbanization is also a disaster as it led to a more waste than anytime in human history. Previously, large for their time developments, such as terrace farming, focused on essentials, which brought food to previously difficult to cultivate regions.

Terrace farms with rice crop in Vietnam.

At some point, people started to slip away from a disciplined and conscious journey towards perfecting the essentials and instead embraced the excesses – and subsequent wastes, misery, and vice – that technology incidentally made possible.

“This trend has been consciously protected by democracy and by Marxism in order to enlarge in this way the proletarian host. A true folkish policy must proceed in exactly the opposite way. The deproletarianisation of our nation—and of every other—is conceivable only through the conscious demolition of our great cities and the foundation of new centers.”
~Alfred Rosenberg, Myth of the XX Century

Today, after the Cold War between democracy and Marxism, another legacy to eschew is the space exploration and colonization craze that has spawned from that. American and Soviet posters, and certain influential films, showed the supposed glory of humanity going into space. Video games also continue this trend, yet it very interesting to note that humanity as presented in virtually all of these fictional video game universes is simply an expanded version of our current state of humanity on Earth. Meaning that mass industrialization, consumerism, tribal warfare, and everything else has made it into space. These cause enough damage on Earth, can you imagine how they’d resonate on a cosmic scale?

“The millions who daily travel into New York from outside and who are spewed out again in the evening, overload transport and make the whole of life more expensive than would have been the case through a strict damming up and guiding of the human flood. In place of perhaps a hundred large folkish poisoning centers, ten thousand culture promoting ones could be created if strong willed heads had determined our destiny instead of Marxism and Liberalism.” ~Alfred Rosenberg, Myth of the XX Century


Long story short, a mess can’t be cleaned up by making it bigger. A new age of exploration and colonialism, even if it fixes our problems on Earth (very unlikely) would be unethical since it would invariably mean the exploitation of other environments and perhaps even sentient creatures and the whole point is to stop exploitation in the first place. And this means redefining “development” since striving to develop has consistently tempted humans towards exploitation of some sort.

“In the Weiserheide the gas comes out of the earth. The town of Wels is heated in this way. I should not be surprised if petroleum were discovered there one day. But the future belongs, surely, to water—to the wind and the tides. As a means of heating, it’s probably hydrogen that will be chosen.” ~Adolf Hitler, Table Talk

The bright light in this dark tunnel of ours is that there already are lots of technologies and methods that go against the mainstream continual exploitation and perpetual growth model. They just have to be brought more diligently into the forefront so that our cities can be transformed from massive all consuming and polluting hubs with welfare traps, to places with a productive and empowered citizens.

In myth, Prometheus gave humans the first technological know-how. Subsequently, innovative minds like Daedalus created some useful tools for a defined purpose. These tools were the means to an end, however there some who lost sight of this goal and chose to exploit the technology for all possible and, in particular, self-serving ends. The result was the fall of Icarus. Ellison’s story has a scenario with an Icaran Collapse, as does the thematically related Terminator universe. It’s been a common theme, yet the potential financial prizes from continual technological development have largely led to these stories’ warnings going unheeded.

“Man would certainly have gone mad if he had suddenly learnt, a hundred thousand years ago, all that we know to-day. The human being does not develop solely through the obligations life imposes on him, but also through the habits that make up the climate of his period.” ~ Adolf Hitler, Table Talk

Thus, in real life, this calls for incremental restraints on technologies that make increasing expansion possible and a redefinition of the purpose of technology and its relationship to humankind. The population explosion of the 20th century is petering off and there is even a much-needed natural decline, thus it should be much easier to focus on existing people when worrying about ever an increasing number soon-to-be born people is decreasing. Many people are choosing to have less new children and that’s good, though technology and the impending AI explosion coupled with Transhumanism is not showing any signs of slowing and, in fact, the decreasing birthrates worldwide are being used to justify it.

One cause of Icaran Collapse is slowly being averted only with another to take its place. Is the Demiurge hedging its bets? You can be sure of it. Stay diligent.


External Links
Solar Cookers
Urban Agriculture
Magnetohydrodynamic Drive – interesting power source, worth exploring.

Works about or involving Technological Enslavement
I Have No Mouth, and I Must ScreamHarlan Ellison’s short story in full text
Dark City
Repo Men
THX 1138

Related Information
Aryanism & Technology – main site article
Essay on the Principle of Population – Thomas Malthus’s original essay in PDF format

Posted in Kampf, literature | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kelly’s Heroes: The Golden Side of WW2

On the surface, the 1970 film Kelly’s Heroes seems like a fairly routine Hollywood “war” movie with many standard tropes of the Allies’ court history. There are funny, relatable and colorfully characterized US Army soldiers; there’s a load of action and pyrotechnics, which were top-level stuff for their time; and, of course, there’s heaps of faceless corpses supplied by an inexplicably inept Wehrmacht. The film was made with the help of Communist Yugoslavia, thus there’s really no surprises with that last part.

Yet beneath this goofy façade are actually a few telling details about one of the principal drives that led to World War 2 – the economic drive. Hitler sought to free Germany from the crippling debts forced onto it by the Versailles Treaty as well as new ones that sprung up during the Weimar Republic. With Germany being one of Europe’s main economic engines and Europe itself being tied to much of the World through various business interests and its colonial past, this meant nothing less than redefining one of the core tenet’s of the World’s economy.

Needless to say, high financiers who built massive, competing, debt-fueled lending empires were enraged when someone dared to challenge the way things are done. [1]

Looking Closer
Now, what does all that have to do with a silly action movie romp? Well, one key dialogue exchange sheds some light on this matter.

Big Joe: Look, Mac, you and us? We’re just soldiers, right? We don’t even know what this war’s all about. All we do is we fight and we die and for what? We don’t get anything out of it. In about a half an hour the whole American army’s gonna be comin’ down that road. Why don’t you do yourself a great, big fat favor, huh? And get the hell outta here?
Panzer Commander: I have orders. This bank isn’t to fall into the hands of the American army.
Kelly: Sergeant, this bank’s not gonna fall into the hands of the American army. It’s gonna fall into our hands. You see, we’re just a private enterprise operation.
Panzer Commander: You… the American army!
Oddball: No, baby, we ain’t. You know what’s inside that bank, man? There’s 16 million dollars worth of gold in that bank, sweetheart.

The film starts with US Army Private Kelly kidnapping a German Officer and getting information about a bank with a large gold reserve, which is where the film ends and where the above conversation takes place. Thus, for all the goofiness and explosive action in the middle part of the movie, it’s the bank plot thread that bookends the film, just as bankers’ motivations book-ended World War 2. Many of the promotional posters for the movie communicate this banking theme with characters ecstatically holding gold yet this one takes that up a notch or two.


The main characters are carrying a war banner that is not just a stylized dollar bill, it actually reads “The Almighty Dollar” in place of where it should say “United States of America” strongly suggesting for what ideals the US was involved in the war. Also, there are golden bomber planes and tanks in the background leading the viewer to think: was Operation Gomorrah and other Allied mass bombing operations actually motivated by money? This image seems to say just that. The main characters in the film know the war, as pitched in American media and propaganda, is a sham and decide to get in on some of the spoils that their government is after. This makes them rather cynical, but they are the products of a system where loyalty to higher ideals is an alien or even looked down upon concept.


The film shows the World War 2 defeat of Germany both militarily as an entire platoon and two tanks are destroyed in battle, though rather laughably by only a few US Army soldiers, and ideologically as the third tank goes along with Kelly’s plan and helps him and his unit loot the bank. After the war, a divided Germany went along with not just the ideological systems of the Allies and Soviets, but also with their central bank-based economic systems. Interestingly, a detail on the third tank reveals that this unit belonged to the “1st SS Panzer Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler” with the key insignia on the front of the tank being visible in many shots. Thus, the climax as the bank is linked directly to not just NSDAP ideology, but also to the leader who made it possible. It is with the defeat of this that truly defined the post-war order and the allowed the Breton Woods economic system, an internationalist trade zone ruled by central banks, to wrap its tentacles around the world.

Additionally, a contextual note is that Kelly’s Heroes was made during the Vietnam War, which by 1970 was becoming increasingly unpopular with the American populace. This explains Oddball’s hippy-like characterization, as he was meant to satirize a different era. However, what Big Joe, Kelly, and Oddball say to the German tank commander is just as applicable to the war in they are in: war is a way to loot resources and, more often than not, the bankers’ means to an end, since war means lots of loans and debts. Hitler tried to stop this cycle with NSDAP policies, yet his main economic idea was not originally his – it actually relates directly back to the United States.

Follow the Money?
A more intuitive approach to studying Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP means going beyond and demystifying all of the plentiful, hyperbolic horror stories in order to take a closer look at what Hitler’s government actually did, and in particular, with the economy. In 1933, when Hitler entered government, the German economy was a wreck burdened by debts, mismanagement, corruption and all the vices that capitalism and democracy typically spin together.

Hitler’s reforming of the German economy, which would have long term effects on the World economy, started the drive to war with anti-German boycotts and a general demonization of Hitler.

“Hitler and the National Socialists, who came to power in 1933, thwarted the international banking cartel by issuing their own money. In this they took their cue from Abraham Lincoln, who funded the American Civil War with government-issued paper money called ‘Greenbacks.’ Hitler began his national credit program by devising a plan of public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. The projected cost of the various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency. One billion non-inflationary bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates, were then issued against this cost. Millions of people were put to work on these projects, and the workers were paid with the Treasury Certificates. This government-issued money wasn’t backed by gold, but it was backed by something of real value. It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government.” [2]

This was all before German rearmament and the rebuilding of the meager Reichswehr into the much more solid Wehrmacht, which was formed in 1935. The key thing to note is that “Wehrmacht” literally means “Defense Force” and that’s exactly what it was. Hitler and the NSDAP had intended (as did nearly every other political grouping in Germany) to bring the military to levels comparable to surrounding countries, though the call to really strengthen the military came after Hitler pretty much saw that the international banking cartels (the other “Internationale”) wouldn’t let Germany run under a system freed from debt-finance.

“Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced into it, not this year but later…” ~Emil Ludwig, Les Annales – June 1934

“Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child.”
~A. Kulischer – October 1937

“The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end.” ~Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland – September 13, 1939

“Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30-Year War.” ~The Morgenthau Dairy, pg. 11

The war ended, not just with the destruction of the Reich and also pretty much all of Eastern Europe in the Soviet advance. The latter was an acceptable side effect to the powers that be, while the former was a means to an end – the end of the NSDAP economic model that strove for autarky, debt-free currency, and an economy based on labor performed and goods produced without the interference and opportunistic meddling of speculative banking.

There have been other leaders that tried similar methods.

There were two assassination attempts on Jackson, both failed.
Two of the years under Jackson’s term of office were the only time
the US had no national debt, since it had no central bank.

War and/or assassination were thrown at all these leaders to end them.

Don’t just follow the money, rather also look at what they did with the money to understand why they were stopped and who sanctioned those measures.

Hitler vs. the Elite Cabal of International Bankers

Exposing the rot that planned the plot

[1] The Khazarian Bankster Cult that Hijacked the World
[2] Thinking Outside the Box: How a Bankrupt Germany Solved Its Infrastructure Problems

External Links:
Feder’s Genuis – Blog examining NS economic policy
It is our Right to Control and Influence America with the Media: Dershowitz – Chutzpah
1001 Quotes by and about Jews

National Socialist Economic Policies in PDF format
German Economic Policy by Wilhelm Bauer
The Role of Private Property in the Nazi Economy by Christoph Buchheim
The Aesthetics of Production in the Third Reich by Anson Rabinbach
An Inquiry into the Nazi War Economy by Sidney Ratner

Posted in film | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment